A state court struck down North Carolina’s unconstitutional voter ID law September 17, stating the law was, “was motivated, at least in part, by an unconstitutional intent to target African American voters.”
In the 102-page opinion, a majority of the three-judge panel wrote that the 2018 voter ID law was “in violation of the North Carolina constitutional prohibitions on intentional discrimination.” The ruling, which will likely be appealed by the defendants, means North Carolina voters will be able to cast a ballot without having to show a photo ID, at least in upcoming municipal elections.
The case, Holmes v. Moore, was brought forth by attorneys with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ) and pro bono counsel from the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on behalf of five North Carolina voters. Filed in December 2018, Holmes v. Moore alleges that North Carolina’s voter ID law (S.B. 824), which was approved by a Republican-led supermajority in a lame-duck session, was racially motivated.
Allison Riggs, SCSJ’s Co-Executive Director and Chief Counsel for Voting Rights; and pro bono counsel Andrew J. Erhlich called the ruling “a strong message that racial discrimination will not be tolerated.”
In a release dated September 17, Counsel Erhlich and SCSJ’s Riggs stated the following: “Today’s ruling striking down North Carolina’s latest unconstitutional photo voter ID law, is … overwhelming evidence [that] includes compelling stories of disenfranchisement from voters themselves. [It] highlights how the state’s Republican-controlled legislature undeniably implemented this legislation to maintain its power by targeting voters of color.
“We applaud the three-judge panel’s decision and hope it sends a strong message that racial discrimination will not be tolerated. Should legislative defendants appeal today’s ruling, we’ll be prepared to remind them of what this court and the state’s constitution mandate: every vote matters.”
Join us: This story is made possible with the help of qnotes’ contributors. If you’d like to show your support so qnotes can provide more news, features and opinion pieces like this, give a regular or one-time donation today.
recent stories
North Carolina sued over redrawn maps
Redrawn North Carolina Senate districts have become the subject of a new lawsuit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections, the president of the state Senate and Speaker of the state House of Representatives, which alleges the new Senate districts violate the Voting Rights Act. “Despite having ample evidence of racially polarized voting and…
