David Reed (left) and his late husband Donald Lee Gardner. Reed fought to securre spousal survivor’s benefits from KRON/IBEW Local 45 upon Gardner’s death. A lower court ruled against it, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court’s decision in May. (Photo Credit: The National Center for Lesbian Rights)

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision on May 16 in favor of David Reed, reversing a lower court decision finding that the KRON/IBEW Local 45 Pension Plan did not have to provide him with spousal survivor benefit, even though Reed was the registered domestic partner of a former KRON4 employee. The National Center for Lesbian Rights and Renaker Hasselman Scott LLP are serving as Reed’s representatives.

Reed and Donald Lee Gardner began dating in 1998. They fell in love and committed themselves to caring for and protecting one another, including by becoming California registered domestic partners in 2004. They were together for 16 years and were married for only five days before Gardner died in 2014.

Gardner was employed as technical director for KRON4, a San Francisco television station owned by Nexstar Media Group, for more than 30 years before retiring in 2009. After he died, Reed sought a spousal survivor benefit under KRON4’s pension plan, which incorporates California law. Even though California law mandates that registered domestic partners have all of the same rights and responsibilities as married spouses, the plan refused to provide a surviving spouse pension to Reed after Gardner’s death.

The plan argued that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) foreclosed it from recognizing Reed as Gardner’s spouse, and the district court granted judgment in its favor.

In the opinion, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court, holding that “[t]he Committee abused its discretion by denying benefits to Reed. During either time the Committee evaluated the Plan’s benefits in this case — in 2009 or in 2016 — California law afforded domestic partners the same rights, protections and benefits as those granted to spouses.”

“My husband and I did everything we could to protect each other, and I was devastated by KRON4’s refusal to recognize our relationship,” Reed said. “While no one should have to litigate a federal lawsuit for three years to receive spousal protections, I’m overjoyed by [the] decision.”

Teresa Renaker, who argued the appeal before the Ninth Circuit, said, “Although the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down in 2013, some employers have continued to deny spousal pension benefits to same-sex couples if the employee retired or died before the Supreme Court decision. [The] decision recognizes that DOMA cannot deprive a same-sex couple of pension protections merely because it was still on the books when an employee retired.”

NCLR Senior Staff Attorney Amy Whelan added, “This decision also recognizes the important protections afforded to California registered domestic partners who were unconstitutionally denied the right to civil marriage. It’s important for same-sex spouses and registered domestic partners to understand that they should not be denied benefits on the basis of unconstitutional law.”

info: nclrights.org. renakerhasselman.com.

Lainey Millen

Lainey Millen was formerly QNotes' associate editor, special assignments writer, N.C. and U.S./World News Notes columnist and production director from 2001-2019 when she retired.